新闻联播聚焦AI治理 META跌3%科技股承压

It just accelerated the trend, and I am sure that reddit took over for a lot of new users. The different problems with SO has been well documented. And they killed maybe one of the most side features of it : https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/415293/sunsetting-j... So yeah metakill your own brands with stupid policies.

At which point do we stop blaming individual employees for corporate governance failures. Has Meta not taught us anything.

So... nothing that it wasn't already doing to itself? There's no one drop where "AI got into the market", SO had been declining steadily for years. I actually expected this post to be about how SO survived by selling its internal organs to AI. Now do a graph for the money. https://www.wired.com/story/google-deal-stackoverflow-ai-gia...

Pretty tight range for Alphabet $GOOGL today, and it is sitting right on declining support. Potential bounce area for the stock , as it has managed well at this price level. If that fails though, watch for a retest to happen from its rising trend-line off of the May '25 lows, around the 320 mark.

Google works as an organisation where you get promoted for redesigning stuff. Google will always endlessly redesign stuff and kill products and start new products because that's what it rewards.

That's true, but it didn't really happen because of these excise taxes though. Tesla didn't come from Europe as a response to high gasoline prices.

I think Lockheed Martin is less leveraged than either SpaceX or Tesla. Also SpaceX just folded in several of Musk's companies that seemed questionably solvent. I really have zero clue how to value the resulting mess of liabilities and highly questionable revenue streams mixed with very solid ones, but $200B doesn't sound unreasonable. $1.6T sounds very high. My intention behind…

If you had time to spend, I'm wondering if you couldn't sue LG or Microsoft in some countries for something equivalent of "hacking". Like intrusion in a computer network. As it is unsolicited installation of something that is unexpected. As there is no consequence for them, again there is no reason that it changes or that it doesn't get worse in the future.

Worth noting that gpedit.msc isn't included in Windows Home editions (although there are unsupported ways of adding it). This is also technically asking a lot for working around issues that shouldn't exist. Microsoft needs to intervene here, this cannot be a normal expectation for using their product.

This is super cool. Would be nice if it could be adapted to other architectures besides Nvidia. How is it getting its data? BTW, exporting the data to Prometheus would be a killer feature.

And Razer, Logitech, nvidia and everyone else who has it's driver package accepted into WU. No, you can't have a "(o) just the driver" checkbox because... honestly there are a lot of reasons and the device manufacturers are the guys who demand that in the first place.

I have a work-in-progress called Modus. 100% written by Claude, so take that however you will. The current release boots on a Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W. The next release (unreleased in the pipe for ~ months) is standard Common Lisp on bare aarch64 (pi) and x64 (qemu for now), with linux aarch64 and x64 command line interfaces à la sbcl. https://github.com/modus-lisp/modus Since you…